[quicwg/base-drafts] Restructuring the QUIC packet header (#406)
janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Wed, 15 March 2017 05:18 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E610E12940E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.795
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wj12icDHS4GB for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext6.iad.github.net [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27241129401 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:18:42 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1489555122; bh=g1wv6D7mm6+DSGR5n36be4vskI8Lo3gFSxrfxZGBx/A=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=M+C7mcMFl25SG71iWL+nWQ2LNsIjBCRy8q+ymWpeyyJrx+Qg5quNbetSqpSuvngBA QhSjEwlut+KQx3WogmSJsRSEMiuNdB//0tLS6i7CDdcQkGY/P+uRdGmy4UYV6Oagd/ q9O1dElMxsswMW7y/pHFd0PFgT7AAHytmRAtdvds=
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab8a50f1dd249166642cbead6fa4a8a9c27c05e22992cf0000000114e090b292a169ce0cc5bbde@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/406@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Restructuring the QUIC packet header (#406)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_58c8ceb26f5de_3e0f3fb9b4f13c38728d8"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/GteUA4YBGfrYkGa9u42DknZrJzk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:18:45 -0000
There are a large number of issues are around the packet header. The simplified/streamlined header proposed in PR 361 can address the following laundry list of issues: #35: Starting packet number #56: Extending flags #119: Server-proposed connection ID #133: Connection ID in version negotiation #135: DoS using Version Negotiation Packets #147: Reflection Attack Resistance #185: Reliable identification of the initial packet for a connection #193: Flags section is kind of confusing #244: Need a NONCE in version negotiation packets #293: Does the connection ID need to be in a consistent location #295: Connection ID on a version negotiation packet #148: QUIC packet header complexity #170: Connection ID collisions We may want to change the header further, but it would be good to have consensus on PR 361 as being a good way forward. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/406
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Restructuring the QUIC p… Mark Nottingham
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Restructuring the QUIC packe… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Restructuring the QUIC p… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Restructuring the QUIC p… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Restructuring the QUIC p… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Restructuring the QUIC p… Mark Nottingham