Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDetection from Recovery draft (#1969)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Fri, 09 November 2018 03:05 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D94EA130E5D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 19:05:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pwPB_m16EZN0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 19:05:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36548130E4C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 19:05:57 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 19:05:55 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1541732755; bh=n1X8gs+nggOk6XeyHSdBa09g+4ChYEu9ZIINVeLVgOg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=L0nT+t0pPBCeaOY1Pc1CkhCpQh6sQeGu6/qPoStVp8FiP5XbOJ4QT1TX6iXPTRjtn p28beeg90oJ8eM8hify4eDzQx8BFk5b08IWhTB/23gHOvLeLJZ8jTx2OpKoioEkbl6 hu6efvorM+29JU5IY6XFw+VMGrfkXG2NoMQBzS/k=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abd0b451ffdfc7504757ded005ede3982e0de2e9b792cf0000000117fcbb9392a169ce16833101@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1969/437234878@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1969@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1969@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDetection from Recovery draft (#1969)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5be4f993acd8b_4bf43facf82d45bc2053b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/H98lEZTKTfgfVjnzeHg5zFfQHqI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 03:06:00 -0000
Thanks Matt, is there evidence the current RACK algorithm is a good approach for mixing packet and time reordering thresholds dynamically? I believe there were few experiments that showed starting with time-only caused regressions on flows with little to no reordering, particularly in low RTT environments where the alarm granularity is comparable to the RTT. If we think there's enough evidence the current RACK algorithm is close to optimal, I'm happy to put that in, but given RACK is not yet an RFC, I was under the impression it was still evolving? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1969#issuecomment-437234878
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove using_time_based_loss… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDet… Matt Olson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDet… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDet… Matt Olson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDet… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDet… Matt Olson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDet… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDet… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDet… janaiyengar