Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CC state after a change of path? (#2685)

Jana Iyengar <> Fri, 17 May 2019 02:01 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D15C12033E for <>; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.392
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jhB49M5Mp5Is for <>; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5B7A120154 for <>; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 19:01:49 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1558058509; bh=ut42KOeNuLYNxzc89CSDLr+nvo8DoZytvuOQoe/2+hQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=V7S51CRrHX/38u16JYw0/EGRGY/Q0gP3JOOKB3acoTrdNOalYdEIJPQeEpmrEulC3 XX0tWn1smSqbabWdaN0yLpHoSB5YDBDo/8uA9TfW5mI6ep4Exwp0RZ7zyhEN+t8vQa WXLfzDZ7UCIjfwm+7VzhQ8b/pWh54kqJTqr/h2do=
From: Jana Iyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2685/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CC state after a change of path? (#2685)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cde160d59685_14ec3f8462ecd968104973"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 02:01:52 -0000

> • Does the "reset" require setting the CC to the initial window value for a connection? I think so.
Yes. We should articulate this better though.

> • Why not MUST?
To allow for pre-existing knowledge, such as stored values. I think this can be changed to say "unless an endpoint has other knowledge, it MUST reset" (or some such).

> This could therefore be seen as a “significant” departure from conventional approaches considered safe
Fair point. The intent here again was to allow pre-existing knowledge to be used, but I think the wording can be changed to reflect that more explicitly.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: