Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Capitalization and Consistency (PR #4989)

[Martin Thomson <[e-mail]>]

@martinthomson approved this pull request.

Two small tweaks...maybe.

>  
 This document expands the definition of string literals by permitting them to
 begin other than on a byte boundary.  An "N-bit prefix string literal" begins
 mid-byte, with the first (8-N) bits allocated to a previous field. The string
-uses one bit for the Huffman flag, followed by the Length encoded as a
+uses one bit for the Huffman flag, followed by the string length encoded as a

```suggestion
uses one bit for the Huffman flag, followed by the length of the encoded string as a
```

This blows line length, but maybe this is more precise.

>  
 The value of Base MUST NOT be negative. Though the protocol might operate
-correctly with a negative base using post-base indexing, it is unnecessary and
-inefficient. An endpoint MUST treat a field block with an S bit of 1 as invalid
-if the value of Required Insert Count is less than or equal to the value of
-Delta Base.
+correctly with a negative Base using post-Base indexing, it is unnecessary and
+inefficient. An endpoint MUST treat a field block with a sign bit of 1 as

As a field, is it "sign" or "Sign"?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4989#pullrequestreview-968484859
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4989/review/[e-mail]>