Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Describe PMTU probing that includes source connection ID for routing … (#2402)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Tue, 05 February 2019 07:58 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00669130F4A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 23:58:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8rUPt1aNnUeL for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 23:57:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47E52130DEC for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 23:57:59 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 23:57:58 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1549353478; bh=OJqRIbWfXGiUQ0y725FTBi2ww7y/64ChegoSK1DD4hs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ZPV6B4aWzjL6Kgzhk9Ze0FRCj7rO2+y1hDLZT+gYcj9BL5YPR5CRVVJcxHpcc6SAj +4bL3UUzmXWpwvc4tDfEToin+uE/UavrLKmTH2VYFPNBh9zyY3p9qf21D6oKTDBbNj O/5z9mNHL4g+oQKbxx3QfDS/tlMmZdDpZJB5u52A=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abb56d2c0505d4120a46d3b16d7c1aabd9c20bea7392cf000000011871040692a169ce1833165d@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2402/c460544891@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2402@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2402@github.com>
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_[quicwg/base-drafts]_Describe_PMTU_probing_that?= =?UTF-8?Q?_includes_source_connection_ID_for_routing_=E2=80=A6_=28#2402=29?=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c5942061b44b_18993fd7b7ad45c0330191"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Ho9VwfmdiuF7ppMkQ6k8eidrkpg>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 07:58:01 -0000

Some background that might illustrate why this is feasible: You can attach a state machine to connection. Each state has function that is called on new input. Once the state enters short packet state, it can be different function from handshake related. So you just look up the CID, and call a function. The same goes for draining etc.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2402#issuecomment-460544891