Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types section and references (#2203)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Wed, 19 December 2018 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683EE130F2D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:57:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.064
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.064 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ofdCASHL6aZQ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:57:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58DBB130F08 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:57:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:57:00 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1545245820; bh=VYCE2MZAGUr7ttcfPn/m9I4XjCsUjTZISOYguJjqnxw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=G0+KHM6xlUvKjg/LbIn78r5vuydVulBk2enPQCutbd38uovBw0CvuH74eAnLDX9ql xy5xaElipAl57oAQkizhLOvjMLN6Nix+lnb85qc0fdkoXykQxdRjhCgML6pWXW+vdd +4twT2MUD1XNeoA7sVru1yFz2OAxuj5chv1IMYi4=
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab1ada6afc02ee820d8d2db85d7392bf328977decc92cf000000011832567c92a169ce175c9b40@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2203/review/186698177@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2203@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2203@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rearrange Packet Types section and references (#2203)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c1a947cbaf72_6c1b3f895dcd45bc10201f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/HrhC5R9-kkEGPk4BLOJCllzKh0w>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 18:57:16 -0000

MikeBishop commented on this pull request.



> @@ -2602,15 +2600,21 @@ each packet sent, see {{packet-numbers}} for details.
 
 ## Coalescing Packets {#packet-coalesce}
 
-A sender can coalesce multiple QUIC packets into one UDP datagram.  This can
-reduce the number of UDP datagrams needed to complete the cryptographic
-handshake and starting sending data.  Receivers MUST be able to process
-coalesced packets.
+Packets using the Extended Long Header ({{extended-long-header}}) contain a

In this format, they're the subsections of the ELH section.  We'd probably have to be more explicit if we take the non-indented layout @martinthomson proposes.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2203#discussion_r243035444