Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Crypto cleanup (#1476)

[Mike Bishop <[e-mail]>]

MikeBishop approved this pull request.

+1 to Jana's suggestion to merge this quickly.  A reflow without any text changes, I would probably just have committed directly to master.

It will break any open PRs that aren't already bitrotten, so do it quickly before there are any.

> @@ -255,11 +252,11 @@ than 1.25 * max(SRTT, latest_RTT) since when it was sent.
 Using max(SRTT, latest_RTT) protects from the two following cases:
 
 * the latest RTT sample is lower than the SRTT, perhaps due to reordering where
-packet whose ack triggered the Early Retransit process encountered a shorter
-path;
+  packet whose ack triggered the Early Retransit process encountered a shorter

**the** packet

>  
 ### Crypto Handshake Timeout
 
-Data in CRYPTO_HS frames is critical to QUIC transport and crypto negotiation,
-so a more aggressive timeout is used to retransmit it.  Below, the word
-handshake packet is used to refer to packets containing CRYPTO_HS frames,
-not packets with the specific long header packet type Handshake.
+Data in CRYPTO frames is critical to QUIC transport and crypto negotiation, so a
+more aggressive timeout is used to retransmit it.  Below, the word handshake
+packet is used to refer to packets containing CRYPTO frames, not packets with

(Unmodified text, but you touch it, you own it.)  "handshake packet" isn't actually *a* word.  Perhaps "the term," and put "handshake packet" in quotes to designate it as the term you're discussing for clarity?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1476#pullrequestreview-132194801