[quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com> Fri, 10 March 2017 02:24 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F7F126579 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:24:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YFgKkk8WP5G1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:24:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o8.sgmail.github.com (o8.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BD8B120726 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:24:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=KgAPBJYGkUOataZtYx/eJgq+iq4=; b=nLla1vlOvmMu7n2/ NHm0znjRTJX4E2WfYpdg7pJLuuSItfeVudvkakTmsknxcAsn23X6R7nFtDW1a+In 2YZ4PyC4O0v8qBsCcVS5aLbgZ150sI23at9PiAlrFg1bWTq9IYNYshI24dGQitxS 9lVWijYoD9oWM6YuT6wOq4qfgjw=
Received: by filter0448p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0448p1mdw1-14070-58C1FF9B-E 2017-03-10 01:21:31.194258973 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0005p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id VCAl6xXQTc-ZlNx8tr_8WQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 01:21:31.137 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 17:21:31 -0800
From: Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/383@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_58c1ff9b8ef1_6b933fdb7b6a5c341035b4"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2n8qaWyWib6OKR4nTF7OVt5rmJPT2POP3Rg9 AEDHEZIVMyvBH9j79tvMPMOPT8etoI8VEyVjrrOifvElLX86Jfl4PKkFj6u6h6Zp4Git3H6sFvhs+W 2Usf1nWVwAflzJYN0pUeeZGUylyMvtFqfzugzOAR81D5vt+RgeW4/jnx9vXFgQzQVOCoaG+A6CBE3t Y=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/I9ZzN9Q8RJ_HdHIDkjny8RLguek>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: quic@ietf.org
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 02:24:14 -0000
In the error codes there's a QUIC_PACKET_TOO_LARGE error, but there's no maximum packet size specified anywhere in the document. Does it make sense to define a maximum packet size or must a QUIC implementation be capable of handling packets with the maximum UDP packet size? Google QUIC currently uses 1452 as the maximum packet size (= Ethernet MTU - minimum UDP header size). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/383
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a m… Martin Thomson
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maxim… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a m… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a m… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a m… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a m… Igor Lubashev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a m… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a m… Aron-Schats
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a m… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a m… Aron-Schats
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a m… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a m… Aron-Schats
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a m… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a m… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a m… Igor Lubashev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a m… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a m… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a m… Martin Thomson