Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify zero-length CIDs and active_connection_id_limit TP (#3426)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Sat, 22 February 2020 10:43 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448C5120074 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 02:43:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hMIQK5e2KkN7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 02:43:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-13.smtp.github.com (out-13.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F1CE1200A1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 02:43:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-9bcb4a1.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-9bcb4a1.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.25.84]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDCB26004F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 02:43:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1582368234; bh=IoXLogXO/OFuWG04QpIbWgr0hevax3A9gz+zUbOcN1o=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Z1vzCd1Sm4vvf4GR43IqIPlEgfWjxdwWV/Ge0dW9rog7H9QtoAfjsD9R5jakuZ+Wc F31jT0ePeR5TXLtBtsSP9/vLItvr0YzCpnZwGCb/eQ4cSmqaVwuUiQzFeMAPolVYxn NYtlsbfzLz8HTR3nbAh3NtvWiTsasEPdJzIpdNnk=
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 02:43:53 -0800
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKY4Y76B7DMMYNHIJJV4LY4GTEVBNHHCCZ7YJA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3426/review/363022670@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3426@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3426@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify zero-length CIDs and active_connection_id_limit TP (#3426)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e5105e9edd02_21ae3f83a54cd96c1022d1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ID9K_tNjOgxhYZvVsF8Kc8n3dOk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 10:43:56 -0000

mikkelfj commented on this pull request.



> @@ -4697,11 +4697,12 @@ active_connection_id_limit (0x000e):
   to store. This value includes the connection ID received during the handshake,
   that received in the preferred_address transport parameter, and those received
   in NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames.
-  Unless a zero-length connection ID is being used, the value of the
-  active_connection_id_limit parameter MUST be no less than 2. If this
-  transport parameter is absent, a default of 2 is assumed.
-  When a zero-length connection ID is being used, the active_connection_id_limit
-  parameter MUST NOT be sent.
+  The value of the active_connection_id_limit parameter MUST be at least 2.
+  If this transport parameter is absent, a default of 2 is assumed.  If an
+  endpoint uses a zero-length connection ID, the active_connection_id_limit
+  value received from its peer is ignored and not used, as
+  NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames cannot be sent by an endpoint that opts for a
+  zero-length connection ID.
 

Is the parameter also ignored in future connections where TP is stored?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3426#pullrequestreview-363022670