Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] H3 GOAWAY should be symmetric and cover bidi and uni streams (#2632)

Mike Bishop <> Tue, 14 January 2020 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98280120147 for <>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 07:10:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h89byJ5yXcEU for <>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 07:09:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1A9E120133 for <>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 07:09:53 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 07:09:52 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1579014592; bh=hVKC3H/9t2gDmGurhlNxHLVZ663tR4Ty5qHMStaYifg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=I9p3BqtH7RldGNAqwwzIcGqKK2fGOX1XFvwvAA6nVqsCAuCEm/9NLsTNcVRlwOpxu IMiMli8W9lQgb9izK6CfNBKO2LfezPz5Csf/sVEk5Jm/Ju3zXSr7V+o3HF1yHRjXTc 8UF8KW4Z3ajEIjW1Ah/3SHz4gur/lUU/3luC3rLs=
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2632/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] H3 GOAWAY should be symmetric and cover bidi and uni streams (#2632)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e1dd9c0a07c0_73003fa5b4ccd960131081"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 15:10:02 -0000

It sounds like LAST_ORDERS would be the classic optional-to-understand extension -- "I'd like you to wrap up gracefully now, so it doesn't hurt when I forcibly close in a few seconds."  Can we agree on (and update the PR to) keeping H2 semantics of "no new requests/pushes" after receipt of GOAWAY in either direction, and leave that for another day?  I've created #3338 for this direction.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: