IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)

Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Thu, 16 May 2019 00:07 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CC31200E6 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 17:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.464
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id joBI8z7PNKkj for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 17:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A62C212009C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 17:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 17:07:08 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1557965228; bh=0OAig7IhFsDE6X0fwb2uRy64mW0ywK63U+AAmb6jrhw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=X21HoM0fSh38sVr/SVD1cTuTH0FIfOyxWqxhvpp/GsBk/ln/KV9r3lqwCyHfpPOSC DrcZJKhX32+ELvl3Ayc68LlS4txaEoUyNQU0zr7Wk8V92DpjtXGdT9ElEWsxyv3x3E Jls5M6XdWRQ3XlbJFGeGngausiJdWCtZR4hF0FUo=
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2S2TTPWGW5UTNHEJN25HOCZEVBNHHBTAQI4Y@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2581/492867597@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2581@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2581@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Bring back AEAD_AES_128_CCM_8 now that we pad the plaintext (#2581)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cdca9acc7df_298d3fb1c10cd96c258626"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/IF74WAqTCwynI9Z4p_y1m7H32p0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 00:07:11 -0000

Is there a strong argument to diverge from existing TLS practice here?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2581#issuecomment-492867597

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email