Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] rate-limiting of CID issuance needs to be allowed (#2436)

Mike Bishop <> Mon, 11 February 2019 23:48 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857AC1311F6 for <>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:48:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.596
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R0zQ43ir4SG0 for <>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:48:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 425B21311F4 for <>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:48:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=X+5Ifr6i5CqXuco1NnDJHWJ/kwQ=; b=mB/v8QXGl6nUwEvP efpUkkASW3cDLhMctTGQToHL8EDFu/WrygoqVbWuiz1HRBECMjN8602CY5cMjmPR ZbtoXU1Uuy5oaMru9ucpYh/vZl2z5bQ3gSyccqNGGnqIlsg3lM7F+aqp3Ww1yAnM 5P0al2qsKhNf5QpP49SHKHh0Gng=
Received: by with SMTP id filter1557p1mdw1-8559-5C6209AE-1D 2019-02-11 23:47:58.988394896 +0000 UTC m=+262513.797113459
Received: from (unknown []) by (SG) with ESMTP id nco2Oq7zSoWCCpx2mA23NA for <>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 23:47:58.980 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB2716036A for <>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:47:58 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 23:47:59 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2436/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] rate-limiting of CID issuance needs to be allowed (#2436)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c6209aee8ca6_67f13fb89fad45c019044"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak15kMpJaFBc+fa9po+sd3PTGBaFdgxYcyZQ9H WcmWXO1BJyL+SL4/iyCzJGWN66ZZot76bTQfOwHmmtm7aOjpe5auuWDJp8MpYIxzerz8Xx1wu7MgVb k5Tr8k71iCUwDVMVVgns6FdP9ItWzl38pNqeaOHAk3t+k7jCY4IxuejxMAOMDEnJshk4AbEhbIwjbI A=
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 23:48:03 -0000

I think the point is to mandate a minimum frequency of migrations.  However, what that minimum frequency should be will depend on the server's infrastructure, which is too variable to get a good requirement into the spec.  I've written up the PLEASE_RETIRE_CID frame [here](

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: