Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Core terminology in QPACK (#3520)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Tue, 17 March 2020 23:26 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B2A3A0A44 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z8juGq09tG-w for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AD063A0A3F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-edec459.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-edec459.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.18.32]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F13961782 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1584487606; bh=8iw/i+cpg5dboO85fm/ultfxEwEMLwvXXw4diwGeh+k=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=sdoDr3SLaQTOQiIlfCjA6f40I70GQPUKobJgG8qXBOzUQKXIaI6p3gUT4qfB3dqQI F9KWTrHIqNTPNMZLKrkzrcO9FOyUYQa13QMHiabCqwCMBHRPGT8nhWhqML5kaPCeJ/ /qQZKvaF5CoPwTRZvkH0fvivUkIuaxTz0vTSgR1I=
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:26:46 -0700
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZVPOCPYEO5RKTO5ZV4PU63NEVBNHHCFHBAYE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3520/review/376471596@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3520@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3520@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Core terminology in QPACK (#3520)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e715cb6d47b1_16a33fe22cecd96818248c"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/IPAj_IYE2mKOStqoRH2lHhAEISI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 23:26:50 -0000

MikeBishop commented on this pull request.



>  
-: The compressed representation of a header list.
+: An ordered collection of HTTP field lines associated with an HTTP message.  A
+  field list can contain multiple field lines with the same name.  It can
+  also contain duplicate field lines.  The header field and trailer field
+  sections of an HTTP message each contain a field list.
+
+Field block:

I'm wondering if we still need a separate term for this, or if we just call it an "encoded field section."

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3520#discussion_r394027340