Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment via header block acknowledgment (#1399)
Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Fri, 01 June 2018 23:16 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA64112E038 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 16:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bdOGjJf1C7mb for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 16:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-15.smtp.github.com (out-15.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1001212DB6C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 16:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 16:16:09 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1527894969; bh=2B0axpK5hgEllbhb+/gXPWoDmh8FMQyif5otg61SGrc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=q3EJ/Q45HHAATYPYvplc7E5MKIcCdJK0r79xyI/b3wsMKJW8wyi6O4J/YKkkNFUql fx0Jh1pw30wWL6V3jSLMc4yVpUbVITHl38OCMQ0UWedD8g4Y9oaU5OYuRSDhBpbjDM ZVbRxZlyWSQ8+P5ljTPWTamVqVLT2bDbFNpZ4pJY=
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab5684c69f62abc615b1b6bb8b3106a889db2772ec92cf00000001172995b992a169ce13860808@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1399/review/125340770@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1399@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1399@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment via header block acknowledgment (#1399)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b11d3b94a4f3_5483ff27c2faf7c69880"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/IVTT-FhJ4HSbqIggGIDL3ftNzUw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:16:12 -0000
MikeBishop commented on this pull request. > @@ -491,7 +491,14 @@ instruction begins with the '1' one-bit pattern. The instruction specifies the total number of dynamic table inserts and duplications since the last Table State Synchronize, encoded as a 7-bit prefix integer. The encoder uses this value to determine which table entries are vulnerable to head-of-line blocking. -A decoder MAY coalesce multiple synchronization updates into a single update. + +A decoder MAY coalesce multiple synchronization updates into a single update. A +decoder MAY rely on Header Acknowledgement instructions to indirectly If the meaning of TSS is changing, then it's no longer a MAY for the decoder to let Header Acknowledgement instructions acknowledge changes. The decoder MUST track the encoder's perspective of what has been acknowledged, and SHOULD send TSS in addition if entries have been added that aren't referenced. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1399#pullrequestreview-125340770
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment … afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment … afrind
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment via … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment … afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Implicit acknowledgment … Martin Thomson