Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HOL blocking on Finished (#446)
Victor Vasiliev <notifications@github.com> Sun, 23 April 2017 21:42 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98EFC12878D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 14:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vzWCTiBRDW3y for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 14:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o7.sgmail.github.com (o7.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E071B127BA3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 14:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=0N+VSHlc0Wy65AFC4PKHw1mpBrs=; b=UqNqk/4O8rfV/5kD 3Hzox+7Ap3tkUwL8LQgidwQ8RGIJZe8hUaBySTmUeJeRWRxjtnh2EmAokHPkkuw4 QExxlkqHC9Bh5zl6FV8CFH5VnechHdrySZDlsgV6ZsGNM5H0X7wjwufqGzTPvbv8 FsfqFHYvatW7JZvJo+qMehKYj20=
Received: by filter0287p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0287p1las1-30578-58FD1FA7-40 2017-04-23 21:41:59.590414122 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0004p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id F2L8h3uaRlqYcz8FlNgagA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 21:41:59.469 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 14:41:59 -0700
From: Victor Vasiliev <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abe80242261da2daae6d617a36188662e9ee72e0bf92cf000000011514e1a792a169ce0d495814@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/446/296490822@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/446@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/446@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HOL blocking on Finished (#446)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_58fd1fa753724_6a3e3fcc29c45c2c1145ec"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: vasilvv
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3rllKwbcrObBJqoysQWHVUD3UdPX8vxzPArv NHy+7Yyq0vI/yzdSyOQqSeThGHJWz5lcqP4P7zYr8nYJoI2k8Vkbi/rfPUZ0dNZi5qOS7L32H9rJ08 2KIIILmcAbNnCh6Gloc7VcHBhOTTKt7mimPeWb3Zk77MZBfUN4I7EeNaAkPSOZ1PAW+F/X9CAtWKrW E=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/IWeIE7SEWwZXp_pLAjyZx5yFkD8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 21:42:03 -0000
It's definitely not OK to not block on this in case when client auth is being used. When client auth is not used, it should be okay, since the record layer MAC should be equivalent in coverage to the contents of the Finished message. If you want, I can attempt to write up what goes into both. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/446#issuecomment-296490822
- [quicwg/base-drafts] HOL blocking on Finished (#4… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HOL blocking on Finished… Victor Vasiliev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HOL blocking on Finished… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HOL blocking on Finished… Victor Vasiliev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HOL blocking on Finished… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HOL blocking on Finished… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HOL blocking on Finished… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HOL blocking on Finished… Martin Thomson