IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Refactor "Packetization and Reliability" section (#505)

janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Fri, 05 May 2017 02:18 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDEE127B57 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 19:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id blad_BhAPZj5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 19:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o5.sgmail.github.com (o5.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 441D1127419 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 19:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=YFrlG2ctO5Y59l1aNzxkf/XUNtA=; b=JgivtlSd9tpjbOlv YVWPYkki0ZBj4S+WLCvz8Am9P3CMOBPSqvwO0Mat8Zgl35LkYMG5I9wmIVtLzZD+ 4i05FwtrvvzS3x12b9bHrv6KRK6EmnXhnGKuX9gXPonlKbZFN5y62FtJrU5OCtyv oiMyMJApvShJe3nmGsaoO/ttK2s=
Received: by filter1127p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1127p1mdw1-9563-590BE0E8-C 2017-05-05 02:18:16.136096137 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0003p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 3E32_bSCQUa6XKAOQ-FDtQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 May 2017 02:18:16.161 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 19:18:16 -0700
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abb9215060e74e7766c6dd618eb9ebf50de25cceda92cf000000011523a2e892a169ce0d7f5e82@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/505/299355722@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/505@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/505@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Refactor "Packetization and Reliability" section (#505)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_590be0e8140c1_4be63fd56eb9dc2c27594"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0zXt+f3Id7ZKTAiKk6r4CypRLq9UerSmq9oc E7K8Q9UQzCJ3Q3Kx5Es4S6LKIo93vBqPgAfy3sLswqbDtkzjecEDqEs3INeei9UX4KpqGOt7VrI5EA ZjZ7o9F0AgA6ubdDWEoV40Vs3gYc2tv9jpAscLzGVBVCcVZe4syBRlFmFGQ5kYrSP39WL/qNakI5ml k=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Ia8uR3NGS4oHmj-M-EZnRwFufwo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 02:18:19 -0000

@ekr: Right, sorry, I misspoke. The point was to say that a client should use higher packet sizes only if it's actively doing PMTUD. I wasn't clear in my description.

@martinthomson My intent was different than the words that came out; I don't believe what I just clarified contradicts what we have. I've added a design label and happy to split this issue out into a separate one from the refactor.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/505#issuecomment-299355722

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status