Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reduce restrictions on valid RTT samples (#2568)

MikkelFJ <> Mon, 08 April 2019 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435AF120302 for <>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 08:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.597
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mbVc6a-fkoql for <>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 08:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42D8A12009A for <>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 08:11:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 08:11:04 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1554736264; bh=zxPgVMDBClAhfwJHiNG/u1t/OL8ac2z0MMLBuAi3kSA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=BPuS3azW5XFQ0ZXZOek0gW7XH1q7eJu+jie7HkrIlUJhBxRLwMtzAnrkS9txFomYC 7qv+7yAobeo82FxC/4T4nnDk5eFsIdi5BjtfIJK+C8jq13PvFiUhiAjeKsDJKUXqk2 /+JPgjfrYfs4Qzct94VnOZAQdR2qxEA4TXROgvcM=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2568/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reduce restrictions on valid RTT samples (#2568)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cab64882f264_4b9e3ff323cd45b429471e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 15:11:08 -0000

It's been a while since I worked actively on a QUIC impl., but in my implementation, buffers would be retained until all pending packets in a block have been acked or lost, then that block is flushed. Having an unnecessary complication to this system would be painful. If it is only the leading block, i.e. one of a few recently sent non ack eliciting packets, it won't impact the overall design as much.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: