Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It seems the minimal packet number length should be 14 bits (#2955)

ianswett <> Tue, 06 August 2019 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DEB120600 for <>; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 10:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id snnmSJhzhzOD for <>; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 10:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81EEC1205ED for <>; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 10:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 10:42:50 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1565113370; bh=Sjl+jT2mmQhVYXFTFQgvmjUyWXMk3eF5xjO47TTacUc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=BkvbaOvklm6itFYSPnk53eJShb9OuK3kD2X/CMiW7WEcTII/j9ldBExaG1NqOKR1t /eg3yr1b+PxI4Ft+3NQ38zQiO4abq6Pok7Ffqwo9vdSgdGhWfcUccScQbZ9aYcJ8Eb 3yKz0UfLWWelakhOm4hfjh7KRd7MpfGwtmDrMGA8=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2955/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It seems the minimal packet number length should be 14 bits (#2955)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d49bc1aa0051_7ed63fadb5acd96844546b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 17:42:56 -0000

You can recover from the situation, because packets are decoded relative to the largest packet number processed.  So the sender has to ensure the gap between the largest acked in that PN space and the PN currently being sent is smaller than 

Agreed on no action for this one.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: