Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify what the "first Initial packet" is (#3329)

Martin Thomson <> Thu, 09 January 2020 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6469B120020 for <>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 17:56:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ic80wtvXwXKN for <>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 17:56:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BC0B12004F for <>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 17:56:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E145C1212F1 for <>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 17:56:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1578534994; bh=LbH3idimKvLsw6EMxO/yr2BhFpNH51/9+jqByXokHmg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=yBInChvsxN5SBLi3KmsElLUhFC1b7ZtbGuGiZfMADdhM0DZg0se+upIAzfusLCvJg QMr70km89n8WvgjdyHGxj3A7d70S1o+YVg/Qa1921lGf7w0+MI+4UZvBs2/l1Psps4 3m4brmM85xdmjpk5LSwya8K9JfrvXHHfszTJ9BC8=
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 17:56:34 -0800
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3329/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify what the "first Initial packet" is (#3329)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e1688529adf4_22883fe9746cd96c3209b6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 01:56:39 -0000

Ian is right.  There are two things that hang off this (broken) concept of "first Initial":

1. the client-selected destination connection, which changes once the client has received an Initial packet from the server
2. the size constraints, which I think we have addressed

Let's make sure we get this right.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: