Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we transition to Open state when recv even MAX_STREAM_DATA or RST on idle (#572)
Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com> Mon, 05 June 2017 08:10 UTC
Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE67A129BF8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 01:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yNF5ipMkPM8H for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 01:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o1.sgmail.github.com (o1.sgmail.github.com [192.254.114.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E286B1289C3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 01:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=9UoK33C4JXo6RkUIQr8JlZCpOPM=; b=Ong63R1vQFBz4joJ QXZhijPE7Xak/etsSoJeJgm9AYZg7wnp/smfWQsIVtwk81q+96hilue/d5+XGths T8kNs+lN93DKn+5yt3YEDDWWPT4ZahwcBNsGRgxHo+6BJEGwtKBQ4UAlwAlYA5dX iQBCRe6WZPuu+EnfLxeBRmzd7dY=
Received: by filter0424p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0424p1mdw1-10546-593511ED-30 2017-06-05 08:10:21.681363933 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0006p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 2GOxprC0SQe1HDbtxf3VUg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 08:10:21.583 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 01:10:21 -0700
From: Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abe837669a261f4ac1b8b79c935147f0c1b22419e292cf00000001154cd3ed92a169ce0de9a85b@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/572/306129300@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/572@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/572@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we transition to Open state when recv even MAX_STREAM_DATA or RST on idle (#572)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_593511ed7b08f_38783fac87addc3424052"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0KF1s0KBbR1hAuYaydpxlAYtFrPZa/ZdKK03 LHhxImIThyB/gDWeGPtx253L9dhbVCqG+BQpMXRQySJQs0pylwnpbHGZsrVXVMEu7SIewoGSKo3lwl 69RRzsHlcTpEJNz21t9yjZDtYmcVQMUQlpfehWKdW/kP0cBmYQeSBIIW0ME7YcMIAILqB1h8O7Gi1o 4=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/IkL4kROut2kHRJ5xYAbVA1-SdlU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 08:10:24 -0000
Opening streams as soon as you hear from them (no matter in which frame type) definitely makes sense (and is what quic-go is already doing). It avoids a whole bunch of edge cases that are only needed to deal with reordered packets. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/572#issuecomment-306129300
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we transition to Open… Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we transition to … Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we transition to … Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we transition to … janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should we transition to … Martin Thomson