[quicwg/base-drafts] Which packet number spaces can't be reset? (#3801)
Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Tue, 30 June 2020 23:10 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518373A0044 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 16:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eJtNt6zVDybB for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 16:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-22.smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 570823A005F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 16:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-d1d6e31.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-d1d6e31.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.105.50]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57EA0A116E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 16:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1593558598; bh=IndkPzKSBy3McyeA38HviK3TH6uSnNYGX529QildkeU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=O5zm1sBoSsh6ZralGVpT668YJTY4wMAVaSRYu+gGdeJkO/4/GfnBvlnGvBfkvPXsW o9/vNIOCEbPpXa2aLaOFHX2ieBSfYHxRQFRAcjL/aGOXT46nvsVW3vpfDYfYa3doui w83mcY+dtKg3Hi1fcBRCDVHpCRemR5Ug7YrtPUUU=
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 16:09:58 -0700
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKYJ6K3V5FXUTGE2FUV5A6TUNEVBNHHCNKBAHI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3801@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Which packet number spaces can't be reset? (#3801)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5efbc64648577_41f43fdb5eccd96c102190"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/IoYyoGoRnPBeUXTXPKDp-3Wqm5c>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 23:10:01 -0000
17.2.5.3 says that after receiving a Retry, clients MUST NOT reset the packet number for *any* packet number space, and references 17.2.3 for more info. However, 17.2.3 only explains why this is the case for 0-RTT packets. We should either narrow the prohibition or expand the explanation. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3801
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Which packet number spaces c… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Which packet number spac… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Which packet number spac… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Which packet number spac… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Which packet number spac… Martin Thomson