Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text on ECN probing (#3585)

mirjak <> Wed, 27 May 2020 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9088A3A0E6A for <>; Wed, 27 May 2020 07:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H3hSjdb7T1GY for <>; Wed, 27 May 2020 07:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 524BE3A0E62 for <>; Wed, 27 May 2020 07:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3BC960DD3 for <>; Wed, 27 May 2020 07:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1590590117; bh=0TUvRF8n7Z1HUsK4SSX/cMA/+S8Rj9rLJBATlEy9EhQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=QMcA8ir57CVM3/E3/L5VHFbZBGD8FOalkNINm6BkI9xkn9F5rA/vmFZog1jS2ZnAU txZiUj4YYj/T6cRrs6pkiItq2MyDVixxNu3wTmunfaW3I5k9R8BNlL8NizSAVHu1oL SmWDdjkdqDZ6gAhk+fDHjUGsiXWSyzDte0KD+fck=
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 07:35:17 -0700
From: mirjak <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3585/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Text on ECN probing (#3585)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ece7aa58b2b8_34e03fa50b8cd96887916"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mirjak
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 14:35:21 -0000

This doesn't address my point. Today there is little to no evidence that these faulty network elements still exists. So my recommendation would be to not add any complexity by implementing these schemes. The current text makes it look like this, however, is a common problem, which is not the case, and therefore indictes that this scheme is recommended to be implemented.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: