Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Better describe the use of Preferred Address (#3354)

Eric Kinnear <> Mon, 20 April 2020 06:58 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611493A1286 for <>; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.019
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.82, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PQ0nSCbukriB for <>; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8534A3A12AE for <>; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=dJ1zJcf1bA853AWizhnZEgx1u7+10j/XpARza804dxA=; b= XluEEIME8jj7XeyPEKcjSbtpi9+8YEek0q22ob/X/EcW/bZ40YIIO5X6YUxJxKHL 0DvSI+/8ls3fKeGaQsnAhSDneR+46uGWA6ydxXgYUcx3+2rFwZMk7mA5yP1+st2d wLudG5kQCJMvDNlr3rmbpx8faqDrY0q/D7RnC3Wk9Hk=
Received: by with SMTP id filter0401p1iad2-8176-5E9D4738-1A 2020-04-20 06:54:48.9745387 +0000 UTC m=+375134.177028356
Received: from (unknown) by geopod-ismtpd-1-1 (SG) with ESMTP id jRiVf1_CQGOXga-fC91x8Q for <>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 06:54:48.960 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5388C039C for <>; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 06:54:49 +0000
From: Eric Kinnear <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3354/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Better describe the use of Preferred Address (#3354)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e9d47113ab50_69923f9a66ccd964117879e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: erickinnear
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0WWoJIxbYN5IAPUB0aUFtoBElHhGZTC0khVZ VcyOSCOJcLLl1LshylhJVyMDrFD3aK0tq04V0bWdn7/70Bf0AmrcXeMJi3r9uJ2+fOjZsZme2O53oy vDZaAgb0Ul0M86KdiKDIziXocT/0ph81ADkpJbgPuod64hShjBvtJcArmYFVkB4xXNBssrbtrdUTyT I=
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 06:58:33 -0000

Digging through history here here, this was going to resolve #3353, however we had discussed replacing this particular set of text and with something a bit more condensed.

We got some of that editorial text here via #3497.

#3353 is a design issue and the proposal from ZRH was to close with no normative changes, simply clarify the text via editorial changes.

>From the comment in #3353, @martinthomson filed an issue (is that #3560?) to cover editorial changes, but that's been marked design and has PR #3565 covering those changes, which seem good and necessary. 

I'll go through #3353 (the original) and send a PR for anything covered there that's not already in via the editorial change #3497, which _should_ mean we've covered all our bases here and the result of #3353 will be "no design changes to be made, editorial text clarified via #3497 and as-yet-unnumbered-PR".

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: