IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] compensation of ack_delay is fragile against errors (#2060)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Fri, 30 November 2018 02:03 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E364B128CF2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:03:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cMcQ67Ygn8Xu for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:03:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8663012008A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:03:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:03:15 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1543543395; bh=/PhN03nErcHMc8FJnSqRwgJD/PavJJT9uAShdiViwQ8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=mdPa2CuNzZgovAP9yjQOCcvNprdxNhV++7pFV7MJHnjtqm7k7POKNircOx4/RR1qe RosTF3XksLK8hIIKQsM5cwNu5p5jD5LQbF5fh0BFFXRTpb5LUj9ZER10pJGO0rMRNL VEFOdlRAyTPGY+ceNHMRBHgvL09qQoDwYrdCoSfw=
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab1182635680d15a0165b108ce47f071a3ceb96f3592cf0000000118185c6392a169ce16f4226e@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2060/443063932@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2060@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2060@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] compensation of ack_delay is fragile against errors (#2060)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c009a63c6f89_74173fce95cd45bc185078"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/J0PW-oNYgW2x8Zg2OCm0kRJdbZA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 02:03:18 -0000

Yeah. Discontinuity sounds the best word to explain the issue in the current approach.

> There is the question of what to do if the specified ack_delay is larger than the value specified in transport params. Possibly we should only adjust by min(ack_delay, max_ack_delay), and then if the alarm is always waking up late, SRTT will include that even though max_ack_delay is not?

I am not sure if min(ack_delay, max_ack_delay) desirable, because ack_delay would typically be greater than max_ack_delay for retransmitted ACKs.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2060#issuecomment-443063932

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email