Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Introduce HTTP_REQUEST_REJECTED (#2325)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Wed, 09 January 2019 21:40 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9293412DD85 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:40:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zQIFplTpfeZv for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:40:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C12B6130FCD for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:40:40 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 13:40:39 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1547070039; bh=EkCp4+124HkMCV9dDqjft6JrXx4dYhz2T02KmOUSg5M=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=G55aUhppHvlXogqyvgIO9Cq749/FKiAFo1yL3VwAE4/gDOrGSNut3gQvlcv5vfqPj bvdg2SSe0a7vIzGWehjoGDTWneHjxWOX9JUvR8zsll/pqcrK0fEhWZ/Zcfr3Y/JtVH 5W/3AyxtoV/Yi8N+hrM4EAFs9IGTuRVVjdYS742w=
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abef7dfa9d8e4644a816dd26405ffa011bd74013f692cf00000001184e2c5792a169ce17b15bb5@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2325/c452872516@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2325@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2325@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Introduce HTTP_REQUEST_REJECTED (#2325)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c366a576df41_40793fb5d26d45bc3189b5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/J1vtNzwCFPRpn8ba0oB9ZPASkB0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 21:40:43 -0000

@DavidSchinazi, basically.  In the previous text, CANCELLED had specific semantics when sent server->client.  However, with the change to make RESET_STREAM reflect back the error code in STOP_SENDING, the client->server STOP_SENDING(CANCELLED) would provoke a RESET_STREAM(CANCELLED) in the server->client direction with that error code that didn't necessarily match those semantics.

Hence the split -- one code has specific semantics when sent by a server, and clients are instructed to use the other code.

(I would prohibit clients from sending it, but if the server sends a STOP_SENDING, the client would reflect it back and violate the prohibition, so....)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2325#issuecomment-452872516