Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] H3 GOAWAY should be symmetric and cover bidi and uni streams (#2632)

Mike Bishop <> Tue, 29 October 2019 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE6C120964 for <>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z54113oT9eTh for <>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F05E6120979 for <>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:24:52 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1572362692; bh=C3qR5o8cI4R93xw0ZFDNo8I5uA5XMDqxHPmH6Y2v3kU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=mVZaGsdxs+/51H/FjqxqGyyP6hohH4JDa7c9QEj9+8IY0PFSbyiMyuhyzGuMhnvDi K+eoi3W2EVFoqrfU2Dg63TL4uxYcX57m6T6LG93Xce6LpTXYowou+eatnBAt89LH2v CGEuYild3uGiHmQaPsatEF8kYoKpoj/6Y7ouLiso=
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2632/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] H3 GOAWAY should be symmetric and cover bidi and uni streams (#2632)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db859c45610_1b1d3ff4daecd95c33555f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:25:06 -0000

The sender of GOAWAY needs to continue accepting incoming streams up to the indicated ID, yes.

If we decide the other semantic is useful, it's easy enough to define another frame (SOFT_GOAWAY, IN_CONCLUSION, etc.) in-spec or as an extension that simply hints to the other side that they should start cleaning up, but doesn't fully prohibit new streams.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: