Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Handling of a lost push signal (#4930)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Thu, 29 July 2021 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824B93A2439 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.005
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.452, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id anIzQW0GDf5E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-19.smtp.github.com (out-19.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83C423A2435 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github.com (hubbernetes-node-afd7657.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.110.23]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 82478E0F1A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:12:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1627567975; bh=cOiUgb+n7ZEE0NF5zxpaSsKn3OTKB9wCFoTXFvbVpIE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=np8DjY1k3jSGK2XIVvyi/3wnUeys2wtkUTAaf1CrJPVOgFqXUTQCdg/Hi1DTD6PeK KxAHwX1Ipd9h8GIo5gFJ/NbF898FjSgixKaBzlod0wgJ/DNgydG1lH1NLZsXA8j2VL GjLmo2+qqYSQl5+PTx1J3dq2SFiyJiFwB0MHjC98=
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:12:55 -0700
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6FIU6IMOT6RVIQ3XF7B2MGPEVBNHHDR4HSDQ@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4930/889179785@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4930@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4930@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Handling of a lost push signal (#4930)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_6102b7677f839_69c72411065d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/J9CSLp-G5m6PaY0TULJWXuDLOb4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:13:08 -0000

@tatsuhiro-t No need to say sorry. Rather, I think we have to thank you for noticing the issue because otherwise we might have ended up shipping something broken.

Besides, option _b_ is indeed complex. I hope we have a simpler fix that we can apply, but for me, option _b_ was as hard as I could go.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4930#issuecomment-889179785