Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDetection from Recovery draft (#1969)
Matt Olson <notifications@github.com> Fri, 09 November 2018 22:28 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDEC1276D0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 14:28:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lh36rJu2ZPfF for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 14:28:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56B86124D68 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 14:28:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 14:28:34 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1541802514; bh=JG1ltAo02kmKxKmwZU3aq+/ezpPe9i50kxoU3g5E7bs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Y8XdGRZCf5wR8m3tBf9LiBj06Yg1TivFHafzSbOVvr2maac+spf0zd1AzNRW0lWmJ uR/TSrestMHK06qJnL0oWAEifBHtrhsSsC2LnYMqJCRBgrLsqYONUrgDfUlugGsPNG tzmvhy7imjpNVPQ6bnSw2B/+x+EyKsJ+aElVD33k=
From: Matt Olson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab4d7e9d3a82e676533af8a12124466c249c8136ae92cf0000000117fdcc1292a169ce16833101@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1969/437514930@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1969@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1969@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDetection from Recovery draft (#1969)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5be60a126f069_40023fc8e66d45b8305f2"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: maolson-msft
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/J9bBay-0TwzuaxNw5iTGHPr8SR4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 22:28:38 -0000
The main dissent I've heard about the current RACK algo is that we shouldn't ship code that tolerates reordering because it might incentivize use of technologies that introduce reordering. Link bonding, for instance, can introduce such reordering supposedly, although that's a bit surprising since you could just hash tuples to NICs. Anyway, that's the narrative. Probably this is something that should be its own Issue and outside the scope of removing the kUsingTimeLossDetection variable. I'll open the new issue. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1969#issuecomment-437514930
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove using_time_based_loss… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDet… Matt Olson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDet… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDet… Matt Olson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDet… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDet… Matt Olson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDet… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDet… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove kUsingTimeLossDet… janaiyengar