Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification on TLP when sender is outpacing the timer (#1718)
Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com> Sat, 01 September 2018 19:55 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE4E130DD1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 12:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iCLVFjbfBi46 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 12:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E314F128CFD for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 12:55:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2018 12:55:47 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1535831747; bh=CRYdxiH7WTZZ8GYWV9EPzw8oNoe71UDtHet7GoTZvT8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=EWbUKLJ5P7yntrYbEzY93t4PCK6SURhcs+GOFOxhjTiAA9RbYFj/sp9PJPPqoY2Mi SfhegyhprtK/6MOC0qsOu0BL7XBQl6r3DJ0UevCzV3yJ18XvUqgTeTU9BnZXl2mOA9 w2lwxMCvpef8snl8V4SqF5dEw3IRbgqfGgHkGRho=
From: Christian Huitema <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab2bea068eda3dc3c927114e22669daa6aea6f7df692cf0000000117a2b0c292a169ce153af807@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1718/417883473@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1718@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1718@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification on TLP when sender is outpacing the timer (#1718)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b8aeec3b96_6eeb3ff33bcd45c4248555"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: huitema
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/JeK0eQSZzNOg7w_0soN9Hwmg1MA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2018 19:55:50 -0000
@aep what @mikkelfj said. TLP should not be resetting the RTO timer. That is, even if you want to manage just one timer, you should have a check that if TLP would expire after the nominal RTO, then use RTO instead. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1718#issuecomment-417883473
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … MikkelFJ
- [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification on T… Arvid E. Picciani
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Arvid E. Picciani
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Arvid E. Picciani
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Arvid E. Picciani
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Arvid E. Picciani
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Subodh Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Arvid E. Picciani
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Arvid E. Picciani
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Arvid E. Picciani
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarification … Arvid E. Picciani