Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Server sends Handshake probe packet which does not attribute to any progress (#3582)

Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <> Tue, 28 April 2020 09:30 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48533A11C8 for <>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V7XlDhuthdfJ for <>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0D263A11C3 for <>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B628C1E84 for <>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1588066224; bh=nqKsRdpnikviG6mLiFRLgR6achuHAgOpFfxzhVG765A=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=OGbuuOrDePLiIl5Vi5Yfayt39RgW1hwoNpJY3JaQXSk+ti0MFm1UHpYc1UmbEpDG+ ooeKBf9T78OWekK8ockuJ276S00DzmTk9Jv771yVH/C1uHUgN8Pq/YKH0CWxEcTfwL +0AAXH7P/b+H0sIvefF8BeFzgCdXjYHVyHsa35RY=
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:30:24 -0700
From: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3582/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Server sends Handshake probe packet which does not attribute to any progress (#3582)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ea7f7b012c23_1a13fcb710cd95c448614"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: tatsuhiro-t
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:30:27 -0000

The text looks good.  It looks like the pseudo code does not capture it though.  Currently, it says:

  if (no ack-eliciting packets in flight &&

There is no condition to check handshake completion there.  I'm not sure how the pseudo code should be precise in this regard.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: