Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ClientInitial is special (#627)

ekr <notifications@github.com> Tue, 13 June 2017 11:32 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40CC131688 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 04:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.182
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.182 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07c0Ml5aAT88 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 04:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o8.sgmail.github.com (o8.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD848131682 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 04:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=Wpc8z6zzl2HPMUiMWFNbepP2t70=; b=v5TUo+trQKOPLyv3 0reYCRNah/kxYPC7R8UGs2OBqEvKM5GbI+bTGwh06E2EiJ1g6+YmMAj1bDxgL01b QlvKZ3BXik7+TyBF2GDVMq9pJ9GbRyivSCl0cajTUrz5tC9M2krVz4U1hKVw8i/5 lBL++dRhk6vGlxKq0Lopzo0+tdc=
Received: by filter0494p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0494p1mdw1-10702-593FCCF2-B 2017-06-13 11:30:58.080517328 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0002p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id pkjXBL2hSdGo-qxe5bXCFg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:30:58.000 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 04:30:57 -0700
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab74eb3a2882a337b70375a749198ad952e093303d92cf0000000115578ef192a169ce0e090b03@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/627/308087671@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/627@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/627@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ClientInitial is special (#627)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_593fccf1df4e1_3bac3fee8aa91c2c181b0"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak35F6QqUrkPPoRKE5PK6rHqkiAdAyPfonD/Rv NyacGcpwgEVfj4qBebe1WRmsgnFul5WqKP50z4EMiMnPPSV5uYaH/5ye/KJHk0JApQkBz+FKPznbFC BQZVmC198ctv0yLzEfMe95n9oA+bZoc4rcleHGDrLdRahcjCAoZ6C34zKQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Jrr1f2PhgdmYMj4JgrAXI6fOW3w>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:32:05 -0000

This would add a new type of complexity because the keys that are available after the initial key exchange are not the same as those which are available after the handshake completes.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/627#issuecomment-308087671