Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] compensation of ack_delay is fragile against errors (#2060)

ianswett <> Fri, 07 December 2018 03:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B36012D4ED for <>; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 19:02:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P6ziMuHRh_fl for <>; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 19:02:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65B59128DFD for <>; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 19:02:49 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 19:02:48 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1544151768; bh=5bK/G0S8ytI9cddNOkVDIMKBb7d9k8hr2cXEx6cYBLI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=tkJ8R0k2yg0X45u1EcIukp8yRSqW6o+HS+msaEkWFdzasF1WhAZTvcJ/MPNmLwo2r GGilWvoHk/T68sHsU2eHuC5MKb6V7KUHmXpbGjdN1N4w5V9qlPI7X4wO1ktgS/8EZP v/C46uC+S8Z9lxrmZqPwKLDjsLGacwQhWASiHdGI=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2060/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] compensation of ack_delay is fragile against errors (#2060)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c09e2d87f079_3c753fb2536d45bc7281e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 03:02:51 -0000

As commented on the PR, I'm increasingly thinking we should limit by max_ack_delay and then if it still seems invalid, ignore ack_delay, as in the current text, but not ignore the entire sample, since even without the ack_delay adjustment, we expect the RTT sample to be somewhat useful.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: