Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] First octet changes (#2006)

David Schinazi <notifications@github.com> Thu, 15 November 2018 22:23 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED860130E98 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:23:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mv6WXhPNc19q for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:23:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DF10130F00 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:23:52 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:23:51 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1542320631; bh=aUK2TAu1wJ3T1GEmKlcmpv4ru1/1XszZ2eWQKZrLRkM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=EfQwe5O1/f23nf1PDMTT8iA/eu5m+npMx8yGKROM2Qv/bPhGT6je1CFbjT+FXhLMT WnJsruMCL98Kz+5KSOdsSQvP6FngljNs9aNQXfswPIznpcfJPM/fq8XGtzj+pveQVr tP+IN9zWlfR/5eedD4QL492mIrX93eWCN8eHo+yE=
From: David Schinazi <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abee49b215639ecc54ecd6999ed993a4e47fcfe85b92cf000000011805b3f792a169ce16b57ba1@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2006/review/175584717@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2006@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2006@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] First octet changes (#2006)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bedf1f764fd2_58ff3f8e132d45c02128c9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: DavidSchinazi
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/K9rKW2uNzD84HIfjMCm1gURgbLQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:23:54 -0000

DavidSchinazi commented on this pull request.



> +
+Header protection is applied after packet protection is applied (see {{aead}}).
+The ciphertext of the packet is sampled and used as input to an encryption
+algorithm.  The algorithm used depends on the negotiated AEAD.
+
+The output of this algorithm is 5 bytes of mask which are applied to the
+protected using exclusive OR.  The least significant bits of the first byte of
+the packet are masked by the first mask byte, and the packet number is masked
+with the remaining bytes.
+
+{{pseudo-hp}} shows a sample algorithm for applying header protection. Removing
+protection only differs in the order in which the packet number length
+(pn_length) is determined.
+
+~~~
+mask = header_protection(hp_key, sample)

Shouldn't this pseudo-code define how `sample` is computed first? The spec only defines it further down (in `#hp-sample`) so we may want to reorder the pseudo-code to somewhere after that

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2006#pullrequestreview-175584717