Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform should be negotiated (#1296)
borisPis <notifications@github.com> Sun, 10 June 2018 06:38 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D303130E19 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jun 2018 23:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2oU5v_rcDhNf for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jun 2018 23:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 538C4130E18 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Jun 2018 23:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2018 23:38:28 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1528612708; bh=xphzUJF1+Xwd3/q5wbx+EpnnX7U8k1AXtaoTRMKY3DM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=O46Cw5hhiWaDSVRxrziEpZj0LkauAlxFtKPL+A5F9tbUWvTO1tIDRBwgjYvfXn/ID Cf3kLc3A3J47NILr1VR2qJC+zKwqja02f87hi30pzBOJXv1Dcl/epEtdzeVPmi6VdX 2WaUNEiMZIHIyn9UuqArsIIJ/eY7+/s8WapIM9Xo=
From: borisPis <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab7e48d29e670344b8f46fd5792c0a0c6360131f9b92cf000000011734896492a169ce12c973b1@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296/396024817@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform should be negotiated (#1296)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b1cc764b6777_9622aeeb510af58956a0"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: borisPis
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/KDr2IvgzFSoBYaBzCZdc4J7aBvQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 06:38:31 -0000
>From another hardware vendor's perspective. It is not only additional complexity or performance loss. QUIC will be the only protocol to require a second pass over encrypted data. It means that this hardware circuitry must be implemented exclusively for QUIC, and it is unlikely to be reused. IPsec has plaintext sequence numbers, and IPsec crypto offload in the data path increases performance by about 5x. Is there any indication of IPsec sequence numbers being ossified? I would assume that QUIC sequence numbers wouldn't be any different. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296#issuecomment-396024817
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … borisPis
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform shou… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … bobdug
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform … ianswett