Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] NEW_CONNECTION_ID text is too restrictive on receivers (#3534)

martinduke <> Thu, 19 March 2020 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140873A0E3C for <>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.008
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GWuE_vV4Qy-M for <>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FB933A0E3B for <>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBE49607FF for <>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1584647530; bh=QqcIzkL4aeRpQhiOuFghvrCU9cHYnwui/GgOpKAzJz0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=utRTUP3keFiPxUOigiOq3u5B44Rft22/k1OETpbPUIBpc7zydrFLZ0NuU/7BZjub5 KQ6GZ1Z1/eJ4RKjC9LHzJImilKaPyrIIKme8ELajjEetB5AOseeQcJtN+WVNwlq7tn QZirKCDaUylbbhSLYg87keTT9tZ8zJQRtykR4lfE=
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:52:10 -0700
From: martinduke <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3534/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] NEW_CONNECTION_ID text is too restrictive on receivers (#3534)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e73cd6a8ef70_18723ffd5cccd960235042"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 19:52:16 -0000

As a related point, it would be useful to say that an NCID receiver SHOULD NOT immediately retire old CIDs solely as the result of the NCID frame, except when instructed by Retire-Prior-to. This can lead to infinite loops if the peer tries to keep a specific number of CIDs available.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: