Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 12:11:24 -0700
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
 <reply+AFTOJK4MWENJKNX5G7EDYRV3ZMKWZEVBNHHB5CCZQY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3151/549072303@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3151@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3151@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss detection timer description could be
 simplified by definining a timer mode (#3151)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_5dbdd4dca3a09_2b143f7e7eecd95c949863";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Ke0CGkrmsBHv0vh5x6jFzbuInYM>


----==_mimepart_5dbdd4dca3a09_2b143f7e7eecd95c949863
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

One other idea would be to add a second timer, so you'd have a loss_timer and pto_timer.  I was strongly against this when we had handshake retransmissions and TLP retransmissions and RTO retransmissions, but now that we're down to PTO, I like the idea better.  I think that might be simpler to understand than an enum, and you could split the pseudocode into two methods.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3151#issuecomment-549072303
----==_mimepart_5dbdd4dca3a09_2b143f7e7eecd95c949863
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<p>One other idea would be to add a second timer, so you'd have a loss_timer and pto_timer.  I was strongly against this when we had handshake retransmissions and TLP retransmissions and RTO retransmissions, but now that we're down to PTO, I like the idea better.  I think that might be simpler to understand than an enum, and you could split the pseudocode into two methods.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mdash;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3151?email_source=notifications&amp;email_token=AFTOJK43RGHCJ3FIMKT4CYTQRXGFZA5CNFSM4JE5JFSKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEC5C3LY#issuecomment-549072303">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFTOJK7K66J3WX2M5GEOQGTQRXGFZANCNFSM4JE5JFSA">unsubscribe</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AFTOJK2HAB46PZEHC3C7YD3QRXGFZA5CNFSM4JE5JFSKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEC5C3LY.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3151?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AFTOJK43RGHCJ3FIMKT4CYTQRXGFZA5CNFSM4JE5JFSKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEC5C3LY#issuecomment-549072303",
"url": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3151?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AFTOJK43RGHCJ3FIMKT4CYTQRXGFZA5CNFSM4JE5JFSKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEC5C3LY#issuecomment-549072303",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>
----==_mimepart_5dbdd4dca3a09_2b143f7e7eecd95c949863--