Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform should be negotiated (#1296)

Praveen Balasubramanian <notifications@github.com> Sun, 10 June 2018 18:40 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDF8130EC9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 11:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sGFFHQQ1S95n for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 11:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A23EC130DDE for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 11:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 11:40:50 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1528656050; bh=wu9ieeaAPif9y6yWxN7CmB5nAcWxfr9dcQecRfDsm2U=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=QI1x3xh5FON+1pbvUB1NkWEUV4wGwadtUrSVXwrCFdTfNMf40KqMef3bCCM5sN9Dq DNcOWEWgPww4IKj+TVaj//9ijyldpXnrdbcEQPP9U+OmMwr2etP1T53pdJ5dEFnT0J DYFl9d65pr4j/vFPUUuGvzRZoEI7ZkMunbdEPeB0=
From: Praveen Balasubramanian <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab3f4f783f2dc63bd990240bfdf271c61edc06390392cf00000001173532b292a169ce12c973b1@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296/396071399@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet number transform should be negotiated (#1296)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b1d70b2ad502_42333fcc70c2cf782129e9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: pravb
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/KmRyG0c4m5k8T3yDQUcdZdfW_rM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 18:40:54 -0000

Connection migration cannot be incrementally deployed without changing load balancers and not all QUIC connections need migration support. So one could limit PNE to connections needing gratuitous migration by adding negotiation. Ossification is a concern and I would prefer lower cost alternatives compared to encryption if possible. That said, my main interest in adding the transport parameter is for backend connections and connections within DC with neither of these two problems exist. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1296#issuecomment-396071399