Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 18:48:21 -0800
From: =?UTF-8?B?QmVuY2UgQsOpa3k=?= <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
 <reply+0166e4ab81e1f5e0e938d3c07703836e36ea61200c2e591192cf000000011851177592a169ce177edca7@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2258/453713488@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2258@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2258@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Initial maximum table size needs
 clarification. (#2258)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_5c395575a934a_9323fe5db6d45c4841651";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/L-2ZynehVn2LaftKBETh9qfcbLk>


----==_mimepart_5c395575a934a_9323fe5db6d45c4841651
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> 
> Agreed. And my preference goes to simply disallowing servers from advertising a different max table size when 0-RTT is used.

I also support this.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2258#issuecomment-453713488
----==_mimepart_5c395575a934a_9323fe5db6d45c4841651
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<blockquote>
<p>Agreed. And my preference goes to simply disallowing servers from advertising a different max table size when 0-RTT is used.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I also support this.</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mdash;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2258#issuecomment-453713488">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWbkq3vtNDhc9d_SNn0g53MXm92_Wel2ks5vCUz1gaJpZM4Zh2fy">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AWbkq-bqud-I_kKQL7AN4u5nW3k0my_Zks5vCUz1gaJpZM4Zh2fy.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/quicwg/base-drafts","title":"quicwg/base-drafts","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@bencebeky in #2258: \u003e \r\n\u003e Agreed. And my preference goes to simply disallowing servers from advertising a different max table size when 0-RTT is used.\r\n\r\nI also support this."}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2258#issuecomment-453713488"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2258#issuecomment-453713488",
"url": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2258#issuecomment-453713488",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>
----==_mimepart_5c395575a934a_9323fe5db6d45c4841651--