IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Praveen's WGLC comments (editorial) (#3928)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 21 July 2020 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A293A0B15 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 15:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Djcgjf2mNxf5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 15:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-28.smtp.github.com (out-28.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1ADE3A0AFE for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 15:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-0eea13f.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-0eea13f.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.109.26]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0328C1000 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 15:07:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1595369275; bh=1JMN7cnw38bbX9tUQ5weDyxNHC47JABwz+satRHTBvs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Vggq+BGiNCg9i3tgBMO0i0S2wrOntwE+ZcW7l1yDbNdgOhWFsanZFv2BHZNhxXgN7 QOuoegcinaKsHyCfZHuD9I5oTY3lwMei5E6cbCcO/ZGu3fRQ5lVgCgYOvsTaj18eGI 2VHnUOgWoGoUzhRTP24b4DmtEdjHPMN2VOKg4J6k=
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 15:07:55 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZIRCYLBSVREQ7DPPN5ENEDXEVBNHHCPCHTEY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3928/review/452863603@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3928@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3928@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Praveen's WGLC comments (editorial) (#3928)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f17673bba7d_3db3fb86accd960219182"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/L8HXs2mtF4BehuwBoE5M4SOfMeI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 22:07:58 -0000

@martinthomson approved this pull request.



> @@ -867,7 +867,9 @@ between the oldest and newest lost packets: (3 - 0) = 3.  The duration for
 persistent congestion is equal to: (1 * kPersistentCongestionThreshold) = 3.
 Because the threshold was reached and because none of the packets between the
 oldest and the newest packets are acknowledged, the network is considered to
-have experienced persistent congestion.
+have experienced persistent congestion. Note that this example shows the
+occurrence of PTOs, but that is not required for persistent congestion to be
+established.

Won't this conflict with the other change?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3928#pullrequestreview-452863603

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status