Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 23:13:28 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
 <reply+0166e4abeb302230972d8d8d6b027267e2ccd3963df68e1692cf00000001182aa99792a169ce174c6329@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2164/review/184911725@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2164@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2164@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ekr editorial 17 3 (#2164)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_5c12e797af2b8_7f03feace2d45bc15751a";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/LYayvnuSOJwpm8xyoQhWbCJzlGk>

----==_mimepart_5c12e797af2b8_7f03feace2d45bc15751a
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

MikeBishop commented on this pull request.



> @@ -2447,9 +2455,11 @@ Note that Stateless Reset packets do not have any cryptographic protection.
 
 ### Looping {#reset-looping}
 
-The design of a Stateless Reset is such that it is indistinguishable from a
-valid packet.  This means that a Stateless Reset might trigger the sending of a
-Stateless Reset in response, which could lead to infinite exchanges.
+The design of a Stateless Reset is such that without knowing the
+stateless reset token it is indistinguishable from a valid packet.
+This means that if a server sends a Stateless Reset to another server,
+that might trigger the sending of a Stateless Reset in response, which

"This means that if a server sends a Stateless Reset to another server, it might receive another Stateless Reset in response.  As a result...."

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2164#discussion_r241596071
----==_mimepart_5c12e797af2b8_7f03feace2d45bc15751a
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<p><b>@MikeBishop</b> commented on this pull request.</p>

<hr>

<p>In <a href="https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2164#discussion_r241596071">draft-ietf-quic-transport.md</a>:</p>
<pre style='color:#555'>&gt; @@ -2447,9 +2455,11 @@ Note that Stateless Reset packets do not have any cryptographic protection.
 
 ### Looping {#reset-looping}
 
-The design of a Stateless Reset is such that it is indistinguishable from a
-valid packet.  This means that a Stateless Reset might trigger the sending of a
-Stateless Reset in response, which could lead to infinite exchanges.
+The design of a Stateless Reset is such that without knowing the
+stateless reset token it is indistinguishable from a valid packet.
+This means that if a server sends a Stateless Reset to another server,
+that might trigger the sending of a Stateless Reset in response, which
</pre>
<p>"This means that if a server sends a Stateless Reset to another server, it might receive another Stateless Reset in response.  As a result...."</p>

<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mdash;<br />You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2164#discussion_r241596071">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWbkq3Vcmvx-1NkMU1bedXqHCETdLLATks5u4t8XgaJpZM4ZShYl">mute the thread</a>.<img src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AWbkqzTP-lxQ_HupGl4XP8ewruNj9yq6ks5u4t8XgaJpZM4ZShYl.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></p>
<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/quicwg/base-drafts","title":"quicwg/base-drafts","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/header.png","avatar_image_url":"https://github.githubassets.com/images/email/message_cards/avatar.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@MikeBishop commented on #2164"}],"action":{"name":"View Pull Request","url":"https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2164#discussion_r241596071"}}}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2164#discussion_r241596071",
"url": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2164#discussion_r241596071",
"name": "View Pull Request"
},
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]</script>
----==_mimepart_5c12e797af2b8_7f03feace2d45bc15751a--