Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make transport parameter ID and length varint (#3294)

MikkelFJ <> Thu, 12 December 2019 18:27 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAE8120828 for <>; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:27:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OuClZ1J3Oa5l for <>; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:27:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07D4212000F for <>; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:27:31 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:27:31 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1576175251; bh=eVG0LTPa30vec/3jw0YTVVVzn4JaMGfKqpAGFkJ1my8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=bJxUaBAnig7hxHNxUbezHZjrdeC7zQBn8OEKGQWwnHpOSrzuzMMCeuDfwjv7RcxJy ixwmleTQrlu09hrGVSnpHfAwT0Mfs+34COXN7X2CtyZXZqcUF8W/IG/o9Hj0XdUxia lb4DqysrVbsHd0qDRacBM+NC5sF3YU8dptoOWKrY=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3294/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make transport parameter ID and length varint (#3294)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5df2869357d8_6b583fce9bacd95c250537"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 18:27:34 -0000

In relation to the version negotiation draft, it is a requirement that a server is capable of processing older still popular versions of the Initial packet. If some versions are very TLS specific and some are not, this leads to complexity even if on the surface, some implementations might finder it simpler to leverage TLS tooling for a specific version.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: