Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reword Immediate ACK Recommendation (#2424)

ianswett <> Mon, 11 February 2019 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0601277D2 for <>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:20:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WU1uElHBw6fq for <>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:20:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1692124B0C for <>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:20:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=RRLOMi1knRC1kgRfn0bQxJVd2S0=; b=ecr3EtNMZUASiQYd moZiQUrZ4WFdHfgJRGxkHq2QUGikuun7inVDNvr1isXP2cwvcoajf8vGlMqxGrUz 2g5wS1+OT5WRFeq7ftowiUNmPevwQw6PtyIJxg4II6QO1KQMytNuSLu+OfImJoAB sJKTZrL+G7O0Wkk7r0E56X4YOM4=
Received: by with SMTP id filter1389p1mdw1-32366-5C61E72E-1F 2019-02-11 21:20:46.782202758 +0000 UTC m=+508800.790339773
Received: from (unknown []) by (SG) with ESMTP id lovy759jRy-SSELGDfV2Mg for <>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:20:46.705 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0EB4009B3 for <>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:20:46 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:20:46 +0000
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2424/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reword Immediate ACK Recommendation (#2424)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c61e72eaab39_17563fe8148d45b42133f1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0+Np0ufhqV6WJDcyFiuIQUeNbIIxTBSFcPDl a0I+4gbs4XCWqVZLj0FHdTK4R8zwdBpja8yJ7Q/jq+UDINpW4yJTm5PL+JzM0Tt3T6ViV4Do6AGrKA KBh9yzsmLoOFQUj3eMx938nBsf2ItgW6HvF1o/UqRFBfCfusbkR/VUXF0Hzra9u3+ANnKNUKjFNnpO w=
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:20:50 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.

> @@ -244,11 +250,10 @@ ack-eliciting packet. QUIC recovery algorithms do not assume the peer sends
 an ACK immediately when receiving a second ack-eliciting packet.
 In order to accelerate loss recovery and reduce timeouts, the receiver SHOULD
-send an immediate ACK when it receives a new packet which is not one greater
-than the largest received packet number. A receiver MAY send immediate ACKs
-for the next few ack-eliciting packets that are received, but SHOULD NOT
-send an immediate ACK for more than 1/8 RTT after receiving an out-of-order
+send an immediate ACK after it receives an out-of-order packet. it could send

send an immediate ACK after it receives an out-of-order packet. It could send

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: