Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] "Invariant check" for any inbound LH packet (#2397)

MikkelFJ <> Thu, 31 January 2019 07:53 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30C5128AFB for <>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 23:53:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.935
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-IDoK8sSM9b for <>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 23:53:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0186012872C for <>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 23:53:49 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 23:53:49 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1548921229; bh=q38BVVlMEKjDqgRe3wG7cGvuDOATRk5ygK2J55Htrgg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ljrm87/1CpZAB5Hmbdr7Fr0hxtZ+h+7uuMTI9Kk6mACr6VPQ+CAIn8eQr7LHtaeoG TX+YbCIWcOcGJt7HFtBbemBbqxJUgt7qnjTDNn6Ztzpva/oi9RhED7PwvPDPHRpMbT B5x+rhMnCyIiDSGA00P5pLDnEYjg3NF/xAlHaTsU=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2397/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] "Invariant check" for any inbound LH packet (#2397)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c52a98d6ba4d_7d963fa56e6d45b8106836"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 07:53:52 -0000

> So the answer by current spec might be different for a v1+2-capable client which sent a v1 Initial versus a v1-only client.

That's interesting. Probably not the intention, but it would allow a v2 SuperRetry packet to be retrofitted into an otherwise v1 connection.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: