Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)

Igor Lubashev <> Wed, 22 May 2019 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E859120077 for <>; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.392
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 98F5L2AWkcWg for <>; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 868A5120033 for <>; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 06:11:01 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1558530661; bh=u9BALAGzxJI3hRI9BkTDlVzwqfJ4TKdoZF14YqHGZvs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=SWgMs476zGaRXU6ZjJwGIDoeGwnNRB38UUWD4uZf+EDyVis2JvH7Qda1azS5LMrat JHqNUGBDpJwNx2d7tropUNYPqcYRj5UziyV4thR+LdjSbwmDvlR4bgnaCh4HkR7zIG 3MUeXhcuOsKuZD6EiXSWYrnvGLjIMMoJz0x7Sc9g=
From: Igor Lubashev <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2580/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ce54a655b9ce_d673ff3a10cd96812932e0"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: igorlord
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 13:11:05 -0000

@larseggert, I think is could be taking us a bit on a tangent, but by understanding of the quoted description of SHOULD is that "valid reasons [..] to ignore" may exist but not enumerated in the draft.  In "MUST A, unless B", B is explicitly named and hence this becomes "MUST A or B".

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: