Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An example ECN validation algorithm (#3320)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 21 January 2020 23:49 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7E912002E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 15:49:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id idEyoZ-HU0Qw for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 15:49:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-20.smtp.github.com (out-20.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60AA8120018 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 15:49:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-a6a2749.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-a6a2749.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.16.62]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5749B8C0146 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 15:49:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1579650567; bh=9Vqjx/2WsTkISg/RD6WOwP7EEqZgAGbFjNqPj0SBK8k=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=pZTBZ0dJ/n/GFJagQWPwD4TwzS5NIOaahe7aOiLVnwrnRn73A9EJhllTtYEeY2TvX TR8SCN5D/JFOirO5EMfA88L+NmLNw2O83YS6wiaG1x4ZshEUmd2LSSP0xx4Dw1uYGM enI2q/hWK8786f2mLA9/WrB8JteFiMbEWcxnd1po=
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 15:49:27 -0800
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2NU2ZV23LYPS2SN5N4GTAIPEVBNHHCBC7C3M@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3320/c576940888@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3320@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3320@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An example ECN validation algorithm (#3320)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e278e0746f59_44c93fbe1bacd9601817f0"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/MEx-GIujJuojtvjfZ17ChWq69uU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 23:49:30 -0000
After discussing with editors, we agreed that this was a reasonable interpretation of existing text. We do agree that it would be worth discussing Mirja's views on ECN reliability and possibly changing the algorithm to reflect that, but it would be a design change. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3320#issuecomment-576940888
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An example ECN validatio… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An example ECN validatio… Martin Thomson
- [quicwg/base-drafts] An example ECN validation al… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An example ECN validatio… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An example ECN validatio… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An example ECN validatio… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An example ECN validatio… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An example ECN validatio… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An example ECN validatio… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An example ECN validatio… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An example ECN validatio… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An example ECN validatio… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An example ECN validatio… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An example ECN validatio… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An example ECN validatio… Martin Thomson