Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ack-eliciting not ACK-eliciting (#3069)

Jana Iyengar <> Wed, 25 September 2019 18:59 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D441120178 for <>; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gGNPpnrjGjx1 for <>; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F3FD120048 for <>; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:59:07 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1569437947; bh=5ewixUDUKeNvTelpITvdfvRG8hBAH81UCu5EO19hLG0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=LPiyPnLkDsEInZdq1WUQJEe/Sjrv2OrBBLfw4sJktOvWfYKjlUAJjAS7pbCAd3wJb mS2tkEMcCPyd0jYtPpP/POXhH+BdDA8zUD+XZL4CfvTiileSKTpuIqbTkAM1eby4Kv L8R4oSq2IsfnxVg2OR35GQMlZ/gGxf7ic2ywUVMc=
From: Jana Iyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3069/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ack-eliciting not ACK-eliciting (#3069)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d8bb8fb1779a_49223ffb4cccd968123731"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:59:10 -0000

We use ACK for ACK frame and 'acknowledgment' instead of 'ack'. I think this should be ACK-eliciting. I suppose if ack-eliciting were defined as a term that might make it ok to use... can you bring the term over from the recovery doc into the transport one?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: