IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Update samples for -29 (#3711)

David Schinazi <notifications@github.com> Thu, 04 June 2020 00:22 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFB73A0B29 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 17:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y0ZJCJ-9jy80 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 17:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-11.smtp.github.com (out-11.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 333633A0B28 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 17:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-9bcb4a1.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-9bcb4a1.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.25.84]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABC2260488 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 17:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1591230175; bh=h1OW+X2f/Cx6dXo6cp6cb8oOZrj2ODNu+KyZHAfiJeE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ndB8/7tGLVzpJFBc+1fVoMrjGkZPvtV6uhVUOAtrFbYLiuOq+9fU+RlCBT4FblbHA gA/vb1zku6atMMmPW30qqgPU/6zcBePpHM5RsgNRW7ghG286hN5HxYjxk7BZpEINoA CxKPpv2MFMUCKhtukiAUAfIdSMgu8FDMGSySPd2w=
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 17:22:55 -0700
From: David Schinazi <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3VWPH6I3D7SCEAREF44QP57EVBNHHCK6WTXU@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3711/c638527852@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3711@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3711@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Update samples for -29 (#3711)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ed83edf862bb_70113f855eccd968176422"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: DavidSchinazi
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/MZYTc8-jfZzexhImByZ2iMQQ730>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 00:22:57 -0000

With Google's QUIC deployment, we're already experiencing version ossification due to middleboxes inspecting initial packets - some of our traffic is stuck on older versions of GoogleQUIC because of this. Changing the salts every time we change the version number will help remind everyone that this is not an ossified aspect of the protocol. The cost to implementors is pretty much zero.

@rpaulo out of curiosity, why the pushback?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3711#issuecomment-638527852

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status