Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] allow CRYPTO_BUFFER_EXCEEDED when overflowing a CRYPTO frame (#3186)

ianswett <> Tue, 05 November 2019 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B091B120854 for <>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 08:24:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z0njRVgXe0Ia for <>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 08:24:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C07412081B for <>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 08:24:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5E3A11C1 for <>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 08:24:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1572971069; bh=TiyZQug2cQ/xJGPdik/h7TO+yX6bJO4AlNYtsfNrblc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=XOKT1q4CdkJoczqJmlTuftz7IRMBJMsqLGgS0kQzIOz8ZVOCWJzcGpI/SEz//byCR hp2dcvUS7CP1/3R2kXc9L0LerXqMN6yV3bELcAVirMRka2L5ShVbKi6dxo0C5p1+Ph 8o9gnycgHCVtte6BQNYmsWEzovV42VfIBqv/I27Y=
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 08:24:29 -0800
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3186/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] allow CRYPTO_BUFFER_EXCEEDED when overflowing a CRYPTO frame (#3186)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dc1a23d3e67d_5fc53fa166ecd9601887095"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 16:24:35 -0000

@kazuho I thought that might have been the relevant discussion.  In general, I'd prefer to have principles decided on issues, but I understand these things happen.

I don't think this is the end of the world, but I prefer the original principle because I think it's easy to reason about.  If we've decided against that principle, I'd suggest we state a new principle.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: