Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Output of the discard keys design team (#2673)

David Schinazi <> Thu, 16 May 2019 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADAE12014B for <>; Wed, 15 May 2019 17:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.606
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tofl8efXxtDc for <>; Wed, 15 May 2019 17:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3729C12012A for <>; Wed, 15 May 2019 17:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 17:32:29 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1557966749; bh=2TDzMu+eCpQXtE0yTUJWp2Q0V96Q1vR7gbN72MupNOk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Qr2LhtwPgt8YmxPVius7YBgXmIqPauf+lbq6tKGY3UTKm5R9b097eTbAFSWweVs9v ZWC7H0gOzYq46gu+28VZsaWEYrrtP3P3tOhpz98ucdMtetQFnDH2qzvILRUQjcjs3P +X+oNfFeahba1ZeF5giWpNrAvYN8629qhc1CZPYI=
From: David Schinazi <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2673/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Output of the discard keys design team (#2673)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cdcaf9dab689_294b3fb1c10cd96c3197ef"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: DavidSchinazi
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 00:32:33 -0000

Hi @janaiyengar, your latest editorializing suggestions are backing out what I had changed in response to previous comments from other editors. I'm going to declare that this PR "good enough to land" from an editorial standpoint, meaning that I'd rather stop making editorial changes now. Once we confirm WG consensus and this PR lands, the editors will be free to make editorial changes.

Regarding the addition of "in the current key phase" at line 1154, that is not necessary because you cannot go back to previous key phases with increasing packet numbers. And you can't receive an ACK for a packet for a subsequent key phase because this MUST prevents you from getting there in the first place.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: