[quicwg/base-drafts] Receiving ACKs for 0-RTT (#3855)
ekr <notifications@github.com> Wed, 08 July 2020 02:20 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEBA3A0FCA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 19:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EY-9LtWXyoQk for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 19:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-17.smtp.github.com (out-17.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 411133A0FA1 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 19:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-1dbcc59.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-1dbcc59.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.105.54]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2CF6E101A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 19:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1594174829; bh=XOfm+42CbRQkVzJgnt75B9Ccp41hlmfZRrkw7mzswNk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Zf1LYbJgtUTlltMEkNOWEXH8eVWIHjgDAEplrEyUOALSzZ75e/jv1WItamTQ5B8vf QoReg0djK1nLZgYy3EuZmxsDIIj3Z+hrcxXIGe9fXrzA/IBVUX11NSArhNelP7yhlL HtcdwsoKftNnn04qTLc+4eXTUVJD+GDwXwESDyrE=
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 19:20:29 -0700
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKYBKMQCQYOO4RKY62N5CEHG3EVBNHHCN2M2VU@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3855@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Receiving ACKs for 0-RTT (#3855)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f052d6d1b422_34523f8f924cd9643948f7"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Mjkv713B1HYhw53WtAijU8qyA0M>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 02:20:32 -0000
> A client only receives acknowledgments for its 0-RTT packets once the handshake is complete. Consequently, a server might expect 0-RTT packets to start with a However, this is not necessarily strictly true, because you might have the ACKs in 0.5RTT. Now you might say that the TLS stack reports the handshake as complete as soon as it receives Finished but that's an implementation detail -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3855
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Receiving ACKs for 0-RTT (#3… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Receiving ACKs for 0-RTT… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Receiving ACKs for 0-RTT… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Receiving ACKs for 0-RTT… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Receiving ACKs for 0-RTT… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Receiving ACKs for 0-RTT… Jana Iyengar